**US Increases Measures Against Caro Quintero in NY Jail; Court Appearance Scheduled**
Rafael Caro Quintero, known as “El PrÃncipe” and a co-founder of Mexico’s first major drug cartel, the Guadalajara Cartel, is set to appear before a federal judge in New York for a review of his case progress. The hearing, scheduled for March 26, 2025, will address preparations for a potential trial, including evidence and negotiations with the Mexican drug lord. Recently, the U.S. Department of Justice has imposed “Special Administrative Measures” (SMA) on Caro Quintero to enhance security.
These restrictive measures limit his communication with other inmates, the media, and even family, allowing authorities to monitor and record conversations with his legal counsel. Additionally, it entails solitary confinement for up to 23 hours a day, with limited time in communal spaces under supervision. His ability to make phone calls and send or receive letters is also heavily restricted.
Caro Quintero, extradited from Mexico in February 2025, faces charges related to drug trafficking. President Donald Trump has emphasized that he will face the full extent of the law. The charges against him also relate back to the 1985 murder of DEA agent Enrique “Kiki” Camarena. During a prior court appearance, Caro Quintero pleaded not guilty to multiple charges, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office has indicated their intention to seek the death penalty.
—
**Secondary Article**
**Increased Security Measures for High-Profile Prisoners: A Growing Trend?**
In recent years, the U.S Department of Justice has increasingly relied on Special Administrative Measures (SMA) for high-risk and high-profile inmates, such as cartel leaders and terrorists. These measures serve to prevent incidents that could arise from unsupervised communications within prison facilities.
The use of SMAs has sparked debate about the balance between security and the rights of detainees. Advocates argue that such protocols are essential for maintaining order and preventing potential threats to national security, while critics caution against excessive restrictions, which might infringe on inmates’ legal rights.
The discussion continues as this strategy is applied to more prisoners, not only in the context of organized crime but also in terror-related cases. As legal challenges and debates evolve, the effectiveness and ethics of SMAs remain a contentious area within the U.S. correctional system.