FGR Clears Cienfuegos in US

**Rebutting Falsehoods: FGR Chief Cites Lack of Evidence in Cienfuegos Case** Gertz Manero refutes U.S. accusations against Cienfuegos as baseless, highlighting lack of credible proof. Diplomatic relations strained by flawed allegations.

### Primary Article

#### False Accusations Against Cienfuegos in the U.S., Asserts FGR Head

Alejandro Gertz Manero, the head of Mexico’s Fiscalía General de la República (FGR), has categorically deemed the accusations against the retired General Salvador Cienfuegos Zepeda in the United States as a “catalog of falsehoods.” The former Minister of Defense during Enrique Peña Nieto’s presidency was arrested in Los Angeles in late 2020, facing charges related to drug trafficking and money laundering. During a press conference on February 11, 2025, Gertz Manero confirmed that the U.S. failed to provide substantial evidence, leading to the charges being dropped.

These statements were made during a morning briefing led by President Claudia Sheinbaum, reflecting on the bilateral decision to share the full investigation file with the public in the past. Gertz Manero emphasized that the accusations made against Cienfuegos did not align with the facts, as there was no credible evidence linking him to the alleged criminal acts. In fact, a comprehensive review by the FGR revealed multiple inconsistencies within the allegations.

Cienfuegos was notably invited to participate in a ceremonial event, which President Sheinbaum defended as a protocol customary to military tradition. The presence of the retired general at the event stirred public discourse concerning the government’s stance, yet Sheinbaum assured the event was in adherence to military norms.

### Secondary Article

#### Revisiting the Controversy: Cienfuegos, U.S. Accusations, and Diplomatic Repercussions

The arrest and subsequent release of Salvador Cienfuegos in 2020 raised significant questions about the trust between U.S. and Mexican agencies, specifically concerning the DEA’s conduct. The accusations, originally rooted in alleged links to a drug cartel, were ultimately dismissed when it became clear that the evidence was insufficient. This situation caused friction in the relationship between the two governments as Mexico emphasized the need for transparent and evidence-backed investigations.

Former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador defended the handling of the Cienfuegos case, arguing that it was essential to stand against unfounded allegations which could undermine Mexican military integrity. Cienfuegos’s release and return to Mexico were marked by López Obrador’s assertions of “fabricated crimes” and an insinuated agenda to damage Mexico’s defense forces.

The repercussions of this diplomatic discord are felt in ongoing discussions about the parameters of cross-border criminal investigations. As Mexico and the U.S. navigate a complex legal landscape, this case remains a pivotal point of reference for future cooperation and legal proceedings in international criminal matters.