**Primary Article for TJGringo.com**
**Controversy Surrounds Rosario Piedra’s Reelection Bid for CNDH**
María del Rosario Piedra Ibarra, who has been leading the National Human Rights Commission (CNDH) since November 12, 2019, recently found herself amidst controversy during her attempt to secure a second term. On the night of November 6, 2024, an uproar ensued when it was discovered that a letter of support she presented to the Senate of the Republic, purportedly from Raúl Vera López, the emeritus bishop of Saltillo, was in fact forged.
In a public statement, Piedra expressed deep regret over the matter, clarifying that the letter was received among many others and was forwarded in good faith to the Senate’s Human Rights and Justice Committees. Unbeknownst to her, the letter was not authentic. She emphasized her commitment to cooperate with authorities in addressing this serious lapse, as acknowledged by Bishop Vera.
Bishop Vera had also issued a statement on his social media platform, disavowing the letter. He declared it was not composed by him, describing the document as poorly designed and falsely signed with his name. The bishop expressed concern over the misuse of his name in such an official capacity and urged authorities to investigate the serious crime of forgery.
Piedra, who officially registered her candidacy with the Senate on October 15, 2024, desired to continue her leadership for an additional five-year term until November 2029. The Senate’s Human Rights and Justice Committees have since proposed a shortlist of candidates, including Piedra, Paulina Hernández Diz, and Nashieli Ramírez Hernández.
**Secondary Article: Updates on Rosario Piedra’s Candidacy and Reactions**
The situation has garnered widespread attention, not just domestically but internationally, as the integrity of processes in governmental institutions is under scrutiny. News outlets have highlighted the significance of this controversy, emphasizing the importance of transparency and authenticity in political support documentation.
Amid the ongoing investigation, public opinion is divided. Some constituents call for stricter vetting processes when it comes to submissions from candidates, while others rally behind Piedra, citing her unintentional involvement in the forgery scandal. The case underlines the critical need for clearer communication channels and verification processes within governmental bodies to prevent such incidents in the future.
This development comes at a crucial time as Mexico’s legislature evaluates leadership roles within autonomous governmental bodies like the CNDH, placing increased pressure on officials to ensure a transparent decision-making process.