**Controversial Alibi of Rocha: A Detailed Examination**
In a letter released by his lawyer on August 10, 2024, Ismael Zambada García, also known as “El Mayo,” refrained from directly stating that the Governor of Sinaloa, Rubén Rocha Moya, was not present at a meeting to which he was summoned and subsequently kidnapped against his will, allegedly to be handed over to U.S. authorities. Instead, Zambada noted, “there have been many inaccurate reports in the media of both countries,” clarifying that he attended the meeting to “help resolve differences between political leaders of our state.” He stated that he was informed that apart from Héctor Cuen and Governor Rocha Moya, Iván Guzmán Salazar would also be in attendance. This implies that Rocha was expected at the gathering, explaining Zambada’s participation.
The alleged drug lord from the Sinaloa Cartel described the meeting with state leaders, including the Chapitos (sons of Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán), as uneventful. Despite noting a significant presence of armed men in military uniforms upon arrival—presumably Guzmán’s associates—he proceeded without fear or hesitance. This comfort is further illustrated by his limited security detail, which consisted of only four people, two of whom stayed outside the meeting place. His remaining security members included José Rosario Heras López, identified as a commander of Sinaloa’s Judicial Police, and Rodolfo Chaidez, a member of his security team.
Despite his allegations, the Attorney General’s Office, led by Alejandro Gertz Manero, substantively validated Zambada’s claims, including the assertion that Héctor Melecio Cuen Ojeda had been killed at the same time Zambada was kidnapped—challenging previous reports that Cuen was executed at a gas station on July 25. The authorities confirmed the details presented by Zambada as they conducted investigations at the alleged crime scene.
However, the presence of Governor Rocha Moya, as part of the alleged meeting, remains unsubstantiated. Rocha has received political support from figures such as former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, current President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo, and Security Secretary Omar García Harfuch. Critics argue that this political backing might have influenced the less thorough investigation into Rocha’s involvement.
Adding to the controversy, journalist Luis Chaparro reported discrepancies regarding Rocha Moya’s alibi related to his whereabouts during the meeting. Rocha claimed to have traveled to the United States, but Chaparro sources indicate no official record of his entry into the country. Rocha only presented a private flight log as evidence, lacking additional verifiable immigration documents or official endorsements.
Rocha’s accusations against journalists Chaparro and Azucena Uresti, blaming them for potential threats against him and his family, underscore the political tension in Sinaloa—one fraught with insecurity and violence. The call for an impartial investigation into Rocha’s role is growing, with many advocating for legal proceedings aligned with justice rather than criminal influence.
—
**Recent Developments in Mexico’s Security Landscape**
1. **Leadership Ties from Behind Bars**:
Ex-leaders of the Los Zetas cartel, “Z-40” and “Z-42,” have reportedly continued to exert influence over the Northeast Cartel from prison. Their control remains strong even as they serve their sentences, presenting ongoing challenges for Mexican law enforcement.
2. **Legal Battles of High-Profile Figures**:
The attorney of former Security Secretary García Luna has announced an appeal of his sentence, following his recent conviction. García Luna, who served under past presidential administrations, became a high-profile figure in Mexico’s war on drugs, with his conviction raising significant implications for former government alliances.
3. **Scandals and Accountability in Public Office**:
Notaries in Baja California have faced complaints with inconsistent repercussions, highlighting systemic inefficiencies. These issues accentuate broader concerns about institutional accountability and the need for reform in the Mexican legal and administrative landscape.
This ongoing situation emphasizes the complex intersection of politics, crime, and law in Mexico, necessitating careful examination and proactive measures to restore order and justice.