Reyes Rodriguez Stays on Board

**Judicial Stability Upheld: Magistrates to Extend Terms under Reform** Reyes Rodríguez Mondragón and Felipe Alfredo Fuentes Barrera opt for term extensions until 2027, citing the importance of diverse voices amidst judicial reforms.

**Reyes Rodríguez to Continue as Magistrate of the TEPJF Benefiting from Judicial Reform**

Reyes Rodríguez Mondragón, a magistrate of the Superior Chamber of the Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary (TEPJF), confirmed on October 31, 2024, that he would accept the extension of his term until 2027. This opportunity arose due to recent judicial reforms. Similarly, Felipe Alfredo Fuentes Barrera, another magistrate of the TEPJF since November 2016, has decided to extend his mandate under the same reform.

Both magistrates completed their original terms on October 31, 2024, which began with their appointment by the Senate in 2016. In a statement, Rodríguez Mondragón explained his decision, emphasizing that leaving his position would contribute to an uncertain and unstable environment within the Superior Chamber, which is already facing two vacancies. He argued that even though the chamber could function with four of its seven members, the current context requires diverse voices and critical thinking to address electoral controversies.

Rodríguez Mondragón stressed that continuing his duties amidst constitutional reforms is crucial to maintaining judicial independence and avoiding a single narrative in the justice system. The magistrate highlighted the importance of multiple perspectives in maintaining the rule of law.

Previously, on August 28, 2024, Rodríguez Mondragón criticized the judicial reform for extending magistrates’ terms until 2027, questioning the merit of such extensions when their periods were supposed to end sooner. He stated that his decision was not influenced by incentives to prevent regressive constitutional reforms but was instead based on institutional responsibility.

**Profile: Reyes Rodríguez Mondragón**

Born in Mexico City on January 10, 1974, Rodríguez Mondragón holds a degree in law from the Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM) and master’s degrees in Administration and Public Policies from the Center for Economic Research and Teaching (CIDE) and in Law and Society from the International Institute for the Sociology of Law in Spain. His career has included roles such as the technical secretary of the Justice Committee in the Senate, advisory coordinator in the President’s Office, and advisor roles within the Mexican government. He served as a magistrate in the Monterrey Regional Chamber of the TEPJF before joining the Superior Chamber in 2016.

On August 9, 2021, Rodríguez Mondragón was appointed interim president of the TEPJF, a position he held until December 2023 when he resigned under pressure, choosing to maintain his role as a magistrate. Controversy surrounded a past incident where an offensive tweet against President López Obrador appeared on his social media, which he attributed to hacking.

**Secondary Article: Judicial Reform Sparks Debate on Magistrate Term Extensions**

The extension of terms for magistrates like Reyes Rodríguez Mondragón has ignited discussions about the impacts of judicial reform on the independence and integrity of Mexico’s legal system. Critics argue that prolonging mandates without the usual appointive checks could undermine the judiciary’s autonomy. Supporters, however, contend it ensures continuity and stability in an era marked by political divisions and complex electoral disputes.

The reform has been perceived as a test of the balance between judicial independence and legislative influence. Former officials, legal analysts, and citizens are watching closely as Mexico navigates these uncharted judicial waters. The debate underscores the tension inherent in constitutional reform processes, where institutional longevity often clashes with democratic renewal ideals.

As judicial and legislative bodies continue to grapple with these issues, the decisions made will likely have far-reaching implications for Mexico’s governance and the trust placed in its legal system.