Notaries in Baja Rarely Penalized

Despite numerous complaints against notaries in Baja California, only three cases resulted in fines, indicating minimal consequences for misconduct in the sector. Calls for enhanced oversight persist.

## Notaries in Baja California Face Few Sanctions Despite Complaints

Since the start of Governor Marina del Pilar Ávila Olmeda’s administration in Baja California, a total of 38 administrative procedures have been initiated against public notaries. However, sanctions have been issued in only three cases, with fines ranging between 70,000 to 140,000 pesos. The majority of these complaints involve unjustified delays in the delivery of public deeds and other similar misconduct.

Currently, six cases remain under investigation, as confirmed by the Directorate of Baja California’s General Archive of Notaries. An information request revealed these ongoing cases, shedding light on systemic irregularities within a sector rarely scrutinized despite holding significant public trust responsibilities. These responsibilities range from documenting legal acts to handling substantial financial transactions.

The issuance of notarial patents, or licenses, has historically been a point of contention, implicating previous governors Francisco Vega de Lamadrid and Jaime Bonilla Valdez in allegations of favoritism and corruption. They were notably intertwined in controversies concerning the allocation of public notary roles, often tied to influential families and political allies.

Despite the existing legal framework allowing for sanctions on recurring infractions, as stated in Article 195 BIS of the Baja California Notarial Law, sanctions have been rare. The law dictates that notaries penalized three times within a year risk losing their licenses. Legal professionals argue about the notarial sector, with some deeming it inefficient and costly, while others note some improvements. However, all agree that the lack of sanctions arises not from legal limitations but from the actions, or inactions, of state authorities.

### Inaction and Minimal Consequences for Notaries

Out of the 38 reported cases, only three have resulted in penalties. Among these, prominent legal figure Juan Marcos Gutiérrez González filed a complaint against Notary Public 37 in Tijuana for failing to remit the necessary taxes and duties for property documentation. The case lingered for months before culminating in a fine of approximately 77,800 pesos.

In another complaint filed just days later, a similar delay by Notary 14 resulted in a fine of over 134,000 pesos. Meanwhile, Notary 22 in Mexicali faced penalties for overcharging fees beyond the official notarial tariff. Despite these cases, enforcement appears sporadic and lagging, with another 2024 complaint against the same Tijuana notary involved in protracted proceedings.

Legal experts like Elías Flores Gallego highlight that delays in tax payments and property transfers by notaries can often mask inappropriate financial maneuvering, citing systemic issues with public registry services impacting notarial efficiency. The lack of consequent action often falls on the complainants, who may abandon cases out of frustration.

The reform that shifted disciplinary evaluation from notary-run assessments to governmental oversight has not been fully capitalized, according to some legal scholars. They call for enhanced governmental involvement and citizen awareness to ensure accountability.

### Secondary Article: Struggles in Enforcing Notary Accountability

While the public notary system in Baja California grapples with ensuring accountability, fresh developments suggest potential changes. Reports from the state’s legal community emphasize the need for restructuring oversight mechanisms to tackle what many describe as a “monopoly of public faith.”

Calls for transparency and stricter enforcement come amid increased notarial activities following legal reforms intended to expand notarial services. However, watchdog capacity has not kept pace, leading to gaps in investigation and enforcement.

Legal professionals are advocating for bolstered resources and personnel dedicated to monitoring and addressing notarial misconduct. They argue that without significant changes, the system risks undermining public trust and judicial integrity, impacting property rights and legal transactions across the state.

In recent discussions, regional lawyer associations have proposed forums and workshops to educate citizens about their rights and enhance collaborative efforts between legal institutions and governmental bodies. These initiatives aim to demystify the notarial processes and encourage proactive citizen participation in safeguarding legal rights.