**Monreal and Sheinbaum’s Stance on SCJN Ruling**
On October 28, 2024, Ricardo Monreal Ávila, coordinator of the Morena parliamentary group, declared that the Mexican Chamber of Deputies will not comply with the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation’s (SCJN) decision regarding the judicial reform. He firmly announced, “Despite the actions of some members of the court, we will continue to legislate and set constitutional limits to prevent acts of atrocity and unconstitutionality.”
Monreal criticized Minister Juan Luis González Alcántara Carrancá’s draft project as unconstitutional and arbitrary, accusing it of overstepping legal boundaries. He emphasized that no member of the judiciary should have the power to reject a constitutional reform validated by Congress and a majority of state legislatures.
In response to further questions, Monreal clarified that his stance is about safeguarding legislative independence and the premise of electing judges and magistrates remains firm. Meanwhile, Claudia Sheinbaum, president of Mexico, highlighted that the SCJN should not act as a legislator, reinforcing the belief that such decisions lie outside the judiciary’s jurisdiction.
Sheinbaum rebuked the validity of political parties filing constitutional protection suits against these reforms, suggesting a necessary review of the legal framework. She dismissed the notion of judges resigning en masse, suggesting they aimed to secure retirement benefits.
**Additional Developments: Supreme Court Changes and Political Implications**
During an interview, González Alcántara Carrancá acknowledged the conclusion of the SCJN’s current cycle which began with the 1994 reforms. He anticipated up to eight ministers resigning to pave the way for a new era within the court.
The potential sweeping resignations have raised concerns about the balance of power between Mexico’s government branches. González Alcántara Carrancá stressed respect for congressional decisions as essential to advancing the nation’s justice system and proposed modifications aimed at avoiding constitutional crises. His critique also extended to legislators accusing the SCJN of attempting a coup d’état, contrasting political rhetoric with factual capabilities and authority.
Monreal and Sheinbaum’s confrontation with the SCJN reflects deeper tensions over Mexico’s judicial landscape and the implications of reform. Leaders across government branches must navigate these challenges straightforwardly without eroding democratic principles or judicial independence.
**Related News: Political Dynamics and Reactions**
Recently, the House committee approved a report on “constitutional supremacy,” signifying political backing for preserving legislative primacy over the judiciary. The political landscape remains fraught with accusations and counterpoints, as stakeholders within the government navigate the evolving debate around judicial reform. Observers point out these developments could shape future interactions between Mexico’s government branches, influencing both local and international perceptions.