Kuni Project Risks Balandra

In response to the “Kuni” project threatening Balandra, community activists unite against potential environmental and social risks, advocating for enhanced reviews, community mobilization, and public awareness campaigns.

### The “Kuni” Project Threatens Balandra

The “Kuni” project, spearheaded by the company Maravia, S.A. de C.V., aims to develop over 1,600 hectares in La Paz, next to El Tecolote Beach and within the Balandra Flora and Fauna Protection Area, a site declared a Natural Protected Area (NPA) on November 30, 2012, by former President Felipe Calderón Hinojosa. This massive tourist endeavor involves constructing various buildings and infrastructure for urbanization, spanning 1,655.20 hectares. The development includes 181 macro-lots designated for tourism, eco-tourism, family housing, and mixed use, with a projected density of 2,612 hotel rooms and 3,162 residences.

According to the Mexican Environmental Law Center (CEMDA), this development plans to introduce over 20,000 rooms over a 20-year construction period, including buildings up to six stories high. The project’s density nears the upper limit outlined by La Paz’s Urban Development Program, which restricts density to 52 rooms per hectare.

Prominent investors include Jeffrey Curtiss from JAYMEX Corporation, S.A. de C.V., and Raymond Gene Novelli, associated with El Coyote Baja Resort, S.A. de C.V. Notably, Novelli has a history of fraud allegations in both Baja California Sur and the United States. Alongside former La Paz officials, he previously tried to develop a similar project in the early 2000s but faced legal challenges from local landowners.

**Environmental and Social Concerns**

CEMDA warns that the “Kuni” project poses substantial risks to the La Paz ecosystem and local infrastructure. Jazmín Samaniego, CEMDA’s campaign coordinator, highlighted potential issues such as increased population demands on water and electricity, and waste management challenges. The development could strain the already limited resources in the area.

Moreover, the Center for Mexican Environmental Law (CEMDA) believes the project might restrict public access to beaches and increase local living costs, potentially displacing residents and turning the area into an exclusive enclave. According to Sarahí Gómez, CEMDA’s research coordinator, the influx of tourism facilities could create social and environmental strains not adequately addressed by current infrastructure.

**Public Participation and Government Responsibility**

The project is currently undergoing an environmental impact assessment by the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (Semarnat). Public consultation is open until September 23, 2024, for residents to voice their concerns and seek clarifications. CEMDA emphasizes the importance of informed public participation to ensure the project adheres to environmental regulations and genuinely benefits local communities.

Jazmín Samaniego urged authorities to ensure thorough public engagement and scrutiny of the project, highlighting the need for a Public Information Meeting where stakeholders can interact directly with developers and regulators.

“Is this the type of tourism model we want for our state?” Sarahí Gómez posed the question, stressing the need for sustainable development practices that protect local ecosystems and communities.

**SECONDARY ARTICLE**

### Community and Environmental Activists Rally Around Balandra

Additional updates from various sources have illuminated the growing public discontent surrounding the “Kuni” project. Environmental groups and community advocates have organized rallies and forums to discuss the potential adverse impacts on Balandra’s fragile ecosystems.

A recent community-led event highlighted concerns over the project’s proposed desalination plant, which would produce a significant amount of brine waste. Environmental experts warned that this could harm marine life in the nearby waters. The community also stressed that the infrastructural demands of the project could exceed local resources, thereby affecting essential services.

**Calls for Enhanced Environmental Reviews**

Local activists are calling for more rigorous environmental assessments and have filed petitions requesting independent reviews of the “Kuni” project’s anticipated impacts. They argue that previous assessments underestimated the environmental costs and failed to account for long-term ecological consequences.

**Community Mobilization**

Grassroots organizations are mobilizing to provide platforms for public discourse, ensuring that community voices are heard in the decision-making process. They emphasize sustainable development models that align with environmental preservation and community well-being.

Community leaders also aim to strengthen local laws to safeguard protected areas against overdevelopment. They plan to engage legal experts to explore potential avenues for legal challenges against the “Kuni” project.

**Public Awareness Campaigns**

Awareness campaigns are underway to educate local residents about the significance of the Balandra Protected Area. These initiatives seek to emphasize the importance of preserving natural habitats for future generations while promoting eco-friendly tourism alternatives.

In conclusion, the controversy surrounding the “Kuni” project in Balandra highlights the ongoing struggle between development ambitions and environmental preservation. With active public participation and stringent regulatory oversight, there remains hope for a balanced approach that safeguards La Paz’s natural beauty while accommodating sustainable development.

Stay tuned to TJGringo.com for more updates on this developing story.