**Judicial Campaigns Kick Off Amid Concerns Raised by the Catholic Church**
On March 30, 2025, judicial campaigns began across the nation as over 3,400 candidates vie for key positions within the Supreme Court of Justice, the Electoral Court, and various other judicial roles. These elections, scheduled for June 1, will be pivotal in shaping the judiciary’s future. Among the most notable competitions are the 78 candidates — 42 women and 36 men — contending for the positions of ministers in the Supreme Court.
Prominent figures in the race include current ministers Lenia Batres Guadarrama, Yasmín Esquivel Mossa, and Loretta Ortiz Ahlf, who are running as candidates from the Federal Executive Power. Newcomers, such as Eduardo Santillán Pérez and Paula María García Villegas, aim to make their mark in the judiciary. The electoral process has ignited discussions, especially concerning gender parity, as the National Electoral Institute (INE) received more male candidates for some positions, defying constitutional mandates.
The Catholic Church, through its publication, emphasized the significance of this election, urging citizens to make informed decisions. It warned that poorly chosen candidates might lead to judicial injustices, affecting the community’s well-being. The Church called for accessible information platforms, helping voters understand the stakes and make educated votes. It reiterated its commitment to staying neutral, urging a well-informed electorate and advocating for clear electoral guidelines.
**Secondary Article: Public Reactions and Campaign Highlights**
As the judicial campaigns gain traction, public interest and involvement are growing. In Ecatepec de Morelos, Yasmín Esquivel Mossa launched her campaign alongside supporters, including her husband, José María Riobóo. The event was marked by a strong presence of local citizens and union members.
Simultaneously, in Mexico City, Loretta Ortiz Ahlf initiated her campaign with backing from different labor unions. Her event underscored the solidarity between various societal sectors and the judicial candidates.
The INE is facing criticism for not achieving absolute gender parity among candidates, falling short by a few females in the final tally. As 78 hopefuls vie for Supreme Court positions, the disparity highlights ongoing challenges in implementing gender balance within the electoral framework.
Amidst these developments, the Catholic Church’s cautionary statements resonate, reinforcing the pivotal nature of this electoral period. The call for transparency and informed voter participation remains a crucial talking point as election day approaches, ensuring that the judiciary will reflect both competence and societal values.