## If Judicial Reform Isn’t Properly Executed, It Could Harm U.S.-Mexico Relations, Asserts Ken Salazar
**By**: Carlos Álvarez Acevedo
**Date**: September 3, 2024
Kenneth Lee Salazar, the current U.S. Ambassador to Mexico since September 2, 2021, highlighted on September 3, 2024, that an improperly conducted judicial reform in Mexico could seriously damage the relationship between Mexico and the United States. This statement refers to the judicial reform proposal sent by President Andrés Manuel López Obrador to the Mexican Congress on February 5, 2024.
The American diplomat expressed widespread concerns from his fellow citizens about the potential risks that the election of judges could pose to Mexican democracy and the commercial relationships between the two nations. “If not done correctly, it could bring immense damage to the relationship. I say this not just as an ambassador but reflecting the concerns of many who want the best for both Mexico and the United States,” Salazar emphasized.
Salazar further clarified that expressing these concerns does not undermine Mexico’s sovereignty. “We respect the sovereignty, and these concerns come from many who believe it is important for decision-makers to understand these issues,” he added.
During a tour of his diplomatic residence with various media representatives, Salazar showed photographs in his library depicting moments shared with President López Obrador, whom he mentioned he holds in high regard. “He welcomed me to Mexico with great respect. We’ve had a very good journey together, and I respect him greatly,” Salazar noted. He also emphasized the importance of the leftward shift in U.S.-Mexico relations with the onset of Joseph Biden’s administration.
On August 22, 2024, Salazar had already raised alarms about the potential risks to democracy and economic integration posed by judicial reforms, particularly the proposed direct election of judges.
The concerns, however, have not been well-received by Mexican leadership. On August 29, 2024, President López Obrador called U.S. intervention in matters such as the judicial reform offensive and overbearing, asserting that such interference is not characteristic of good neighbors.
—
## Secondary Article: Expert Opinions on Judicial Reform and U.S.-Mexico Relations
**Additional Research by TJGringo.com Team**
In light of the ongoing discussions surrounding the judicial reform in Mexico and its potential implications on U.S.-Mexico relations, several experts have weighed in on the issue.
According to **Dr. Sandra Martínez**, a political analyst specializing in North American relations, any significant policy changes that affect the judiciary must be approached with caution. “The integrity of democratic institutions is vital for maintaining not only internal stability but also fostering trust and cooperation with international partners. The U.S. and Mexico share deep economic and diplomatic ties that could be jeopardized by hasty or poorly planned judicial reforms,” she stated.
**John Smithers**, an international trade expert, added that “Mexico is a pivotal trade partner for the U.S., and disruptions in its judiciary system could lead to uncertainties affecting bilateral agreements and commercial relations. Businesses thrive in environments where legal certainty is guaranteed.”
Moreover, **Sofia Rodríguez**, a legal expert, pointed out, “Direct elections of judges could politicize the judiciary, which is counterproductive to the principles of impartiality and fairness that legal systems are built upon. This could lead to a volatile legal environment, affecting both domestic and foreign investments.”
The sentiment among U.S. officials and intellectuals reflects a common thread: the need for thorough and well-considered reforms to maintain the robust and cooperative relationship between Mexico and the United States.
Stay tuned to TJGringo.com for more updates and expert analysis on this developing story.