**INE Approves 13,205 Million Pesos for Judicial Election; Sheinbaum Calls It Excessive**
The National Electoral Institute (INE) of Mexico has approved a budget of 13,205 million pesos for the upcoming judicial elections to take place in June 2025. This significant allocation aims to fund elections for judges, magistrates, and ministers of the Federal Judiciary. In their recent session, INE’s board presented this budget as a precautionary measure due to legal decisions pending from the Supreme Court regarding possible reforms.
Despite the need to adhere to financial submissions deadlines set by the Secretary of Finance, the proposal faced criticism from various quarters, notably from Claudia Sheinbaum, President of Mexico, who expressed that the budget was excessively high. She argued that given the absence of other electoral processes in 2025, costs should be effectively reduced. Sheinbaum suggested that elections could proceed with fewer resources given that there were no obligations to fund political party campaigns during this judicial selection period.
**Secondary Article: Concerns and Alternatives for the Judicial Election Budget**
The allocation of resources for Mexico’s 2025 judicial election continues to stir debate. Various political figures and party representatives have voiced their concerns over the considerable financial outlay during ongoing discussions.
Critics argue that the funds could be better used to address significant public needs. For instance, Emilio Suárez Licona from the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) pointed out that this budget equates to funding for numerous societal projects such as modern hospitals and increased educational infrastructure. PAN’s representative, VÃctor Hugo Sondón Saavedra, highlighted the need for prudence in financial decisions, advocating for law-abiding fiscal practices to avoid straining Mexico’s budget strategies.
Sergio Gutiérrez Luna, related to the Chamber of Deputies, advised the INE to seek collaborative solutions to minimize costs. By suggesting a reduction from the proposed 13 billion pesos, Gutiérrez Luna encouraged exploring alternatives for more economic electoral processes.
On a different note, the INE clarified that the majority of these funds would cover personnel and operational logistics, urging the government and public to understand the procedural requirements as mandated constitutionally. Still, as the deadline approached, a consensus on the budget allocation remained elusive amidst the complex legal backdrop.
**Conclusion**
The debate around the judicial election funding in Mexico spotlights the intersection of governance, fiscal responsibility, and public welfare. As the nation inches closer to a pivotal electoral cycle, it stands at a crossroad, balancing foundational democratic processes with socioeconomic priorities. The unfolding discussion over these budgetary allocations is emblematic of larger systemic questions regarding resource management and national priorities.