**Opposition Accuses Militarization of National Guard; Officials Deny Claims**
In a recent legislative session, the XVII Legislature of the State Congress of Baja California Sur passed a reform concerning the National Guard, with 17 votes in favor and two against. The session sparked heated debate as opposition members accused the reform of leading to the militarization of the police force, which they argue benefits the current regime.
Guadalupe Saldaña Cisneros, a deputy from the National Action Party (PAN), and Fabrizio del Castillo Miranda, from the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), opposed the reform proposed by the Commission of Constitutional and Justice and Public Security Points. Saldaña Cisneros expressed her disagreement, emphasizing that the reform would grant the National Guard critical responsibilities like crime investigation and prosecution, all under the command of the National Defense Secretariat (Sedena).
She argued that the reform aims to establish authoritarian governments that could seek to remain in power indefinitely. “This ruling is immoral, dangerous, and an attack on democracy and justice,” she stated clearly from her platform.
Conversely, the President of the Security Commission, Deputy Guadalupe Vázquez Jacinto from the ruling party, defended the reform bill sent by the Senate, asserting its necessity in providing clear regulations for the National Guard. “It helps prevent and address any abuses or overreaches by the members. There is no militarization happening,” she reassured.
The reform modifies 12 articles of the general Constitution, empowering the state with a police force to implement the National Public Security Strategy. It’s noteworthy that this reform was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation shortly before the end of former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s administration.
—
**Additional News: Guard Controversy Stirs National Debate**
The National Guard reform in Mexico is not just stirring local debate in Baja California Sur but is also attracting national attention. Various civil rights organizations and political analysts have raised concerns over its potential implications. They argue that placing a civil institution under military control could lead to an erosion of civil liberties and weaken democratic checks and balances.
In response, supporters of the reform argue that the security challenges facing Mexico necessitate robust measures, and bringing the National Guard under military oversight would ensure greater discipline and efficiency. They point out that the rise in organized crime and violence demands a coordinated approach led by disciplined forces.
International observers have also taken interest, noting that Mexico’s approach to public security will set significant precedents for similar governance models in the region. As this reform unfolds, its impact on governance and civil liberties will likely remain a contentious issue in the country.
**For more analytical perspectives and updates on this developing topic, stay tuned to TJGringo.com.**