**International Courts as a Last Resort to Prevent “Constitutional Supremacy” Reform: PAN Senator**
Senator Gustavo Sánchez, representing Baja California for the National Action Party (PAN), has indicated that international courts may be the only remaining avenue to contest the recently approved “Constitutional Supremacy” reform in Mexico. This reform, backed by lawmakers from the National Regeneration Movement (Morena), proposes that any changes to the Mexican Constitution can no longer be challenged.
Senator Sánchez criticized the rapid pace with which the reform was pushed through the Senate, describing it as troubling. The proposal was introduced and swiftly voted on in a plenary session, where it passed with a significant majority—85 votes in favor and 41 against—after a grueling 13-hour debate. During this session, the opposition, including PAN, actively contested the reform, warning of its potential “danger.”
As the proposal now moves to the Chamber of Deputies, where discussions are predicted to continue, Senator Sánchez emphasized that the journey isn’t over. It still requires approval from state congresses and must be officially published. He stressed that if necessary, Mexico must appeal to international courts, to which it is a signatory, for adjudication on whether this legislative move stands in violation of international norms.
**Secondary Article: Growing Concerns Over Legal Repercussions of the “Constitutional Supremacy” Reform**
The “Constitutional Supremacy” reform in Mexico has spurred intensive debate and legal scrutiny. Critics argue that it undermines democratic safeguards by making constitutional amendments immune to challenge. Proponents of the reform assert it aims to streamline governance and cut bureaucratic red tape.
Amidst the controversy, legal experts point out potential conflicts with international laws and agreements to which Mexico is bound. Observers question how such legal discrepancies will be resolved if international courts deem the reform incompatible with established international legal standards.
This brewing contention highlights a significant crossroads for Mexico’s legal framework and its alignment with global legal systems, emphasizing the critical role that international judicial bodies might play in resolving these disputes. The path forward remains uncertain, as advocates await upcoming votes in Mexico’s legislative process and brace for potential international legal battles ahead.