**New Leadership for CNDH Should Foster State-Level Collaboration**
As the election for the new head of the National Human Rights Commission (CNDH) approaches, it’s essential that the newly appointed leader maintains open and effective communication with state-level human rights organizations. This is the sentiment expressed by Jorge Álvaro Ochoa Orduño, head of the State Human Rights Commission of Baja California (CEDHBC), who emphasizes the importance of collaborative work in defending human rights.
On November 12, the Senate will vote to determine the CNDH president for the next five years. Currently, the shortlist includes three female candidates: Rosario Piedra Ibarra, Nashieli Ramírez Hernández, and Paulina Hernández Díaz. Each brings distinct experiences and qualifications to the table. Ochoa Orduño hopes whoever is chosen will prioritize cooperation with state bodies, an aspect he believes waned during Piedra Ibarra’s leadership.
Piedra Ibarra seeks reelection despite controversies surrounding her term. Critics, including the non-profit Centro Prodh, highlight her modest track record in addressing complaints against national security forces, raising doubts about her reappointment.
As the Senate’s choice looms, Ochoa Orduño considers the election a significant moment, predicting it could shape the future of Mexico’s human rights landscape. The new president will need to prioritize the welfare of victims through seamless coordination with local human rights entities.
**Secondary Article: Concerns and Challenges During Leadership Transition**
The candidacy of current CNDH head Rosario Piedra Ibarra faces criticisms that put her reelection in jeopardy. With the upcoming decision by the Senate, organizations and activists voice concerns over her record. Despite being part of the final shortlist, her evaluation ranked her lower than many other candidates, raising eyebrows among observers.
A significant point of contention is the claim that under her tenure, the CNDH has been notably passive concerning cases involving the National Guard and the army, despite receiving numerous complaints. These concerns are echoed by various rights groups which argue for a more proactive stance in defending citizens against abuses.
Moreover, the potential arrival of Jorge Alejandro Palau Hernández as the interim head of the National Institute of Migration (INM) in Baja California stirs apprehension among activists, given past allegations of violence against migrants. As such, local advocates are on high alert, pushing for transparent and rights-respecting governance in these critical institutions.
Overall, the election of the CNDH president will not only impact the direction of human rights advocacy at a national level but also have ripple effects throughout state and local efforts, influencing future policy and enforcement actions.