**Morena Announces Changes to AMLO’s Judicial Reform**
Moisés Ignacio Mier Velazco, coordinator of the Morena parliamentary group in the Chamber of Deputies, revealed on August 6, 2024, that the judicial reform proposal by President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, submitted on February 5, 2024, will undergo some changes.
During the penultimate forum in Saltillo, Coahuila, Mier Velazco announced that two adjustments to the proposal are being prepared, ensuring that the essence of the reform remains intact.
“In the coming days, we will present the first lines of modifications to the proposal in various central aspects,” Mier Velazco said. He explained that the two changes aim to make the popular election of judges, magistrates, and ministers more feasible.
The first modification concerns the structure and new configuration of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN), which currently has eleven ministers. “We are looking at reforming the composition of the SCJN and implementing a new designation procedure for its members,” stated Mier Velazco. This includes the introduction of Evaluation Committees to assess candidates running for judicial positions.
These committees will ensure that eligibility criteria are met, enabling both men and women who qualify to pass through these technical committees. The committees will consist of individuals with high expertise and experience in justice administration.
“These technical committees will use interviews, exams, and essays to determine the suitability of the most qualified candidates, those who possess the necessary academic, personal, and life history traits, to fulfill this significant role. Current officials will also be able to participate,” added Mier Velazco.
The second modification involves the gradual and staggered election of judges, magistrates, and ministers, affecting the periodic renewal process of the Federal Judiciary.
Mier Velazco hinted that during the final forum in Sinaloa, the first two modifications to López Obrador’s proposal, which is supported by Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo, the de facto elected President, might be discussed.
—
**Additional News: Judicial Reform Sparks Debate**
As the proposed judicial reform by President Andrés Manuel López Obrador moves through legislative scrutiny and public forums, it continues to spark significant debate among legal experts, politicians, and the public alike. Critics argue that the reform, particularly the aspect involving the popular election of judges, could undermine judicial independence by making judges susceptible to political influence.
Proponents insist that the reform aims to democratize the judiciary and ensure that it remains accountable to the people. This debate reflects broader concerns about balancing judicial independence with accountability in a democratic society.
As forums and discussions progress, the final shape of the judicial reform and its implications for Mexico’s legal and political landscape remain to be seen.